Things Medieval, Muddled, and Anonymous
You know, I'm the first to admit that about 85% of In the Middle sails right over my head— and it's not because I'm uninterested, or completely uninformed about medieval studies and theory. I suspect my estrangement is partly because I'm very literal and philologically minded; partly it's a difference in our approach to texts. I am, however, positive about two things.
Whether or not I can follow the arguments and discussions of In the Middle, I am very much aware that the ItM coterie actively mentor graduate students; that they reach out and encourage and engage and include graduate students in their blog and in person at conferences. The other thing I am certain about is that both Eileen Joy and Jeffrey Cohen practice scholarship with not only zeal, but with active, even infectious, joy in the pursuit of scholarship, in text, in learning and in teaching.
I really don't see any mentoring, any joy, or any value in the exceedingly impenetrable and downright malicious attack blog. It serves no purpose beyond malice, and byte wankery.

5 Comments:
That is very high praise indeed, Lisa, and I will try my very best to live up to it. THANK YOU.
I don't read "In the Middle" or "In the Medieval Muddle" -- not my cup of tea. But I do read Digital Medievalist! Unfortunately, I think there might be something wrong with your feed. If not for Unlocked Wordhoard, I'd still think you hadn't written anything since the July 5th "Medieval Outreach and Social Networking".
Thank you, Lisa, both for your honesty and for your affirmation.
Wil I've done some behind the scenes tinkering; both RSS feeds should work; either http://digitalmedievalist.com/news/blogger_rss.xml
http://digitalmedievalist.com/news/rss.xml
They're identical in content, and thanks to you and Scott Nokes to the heads up.
I suspect that there may be something intrinsic to medieval studies/history that brings out people's unpleasantly argumentative sides.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home